• SEC takes legal action against Prager Metis, auditor of bankrupt crypto exchange FTX.
• Prager Metis is accused of breaching auditor independence rules by adding indemnification provisions.
• Lack of transparency and ethical concerns raise questions about auditing practices in the cryptocurrency industry.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken legal action against Prager Metis, the auditor of the now-bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX, alleging multiple breaches of auditor independence rules.

The SEC has accused Prager Metis of failing to maintain the required independence while providing auditing services to its clients. This violation of auditor independence rules is a serious issue that can have significant repercussions in the financial industry.

SEC charges against Prager Metis 

According to the SEC, Prager Metis added indemnification provisions to engagement letters for more than 200 audits, reviews, and exams conducted between December 2017 and December 2020. This act compromised their independence from their clients, contravening federal securities laws.

Even more concerning is the allegation that Prager Metis failed to notify its clients about these violations, despite being informed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) that these indemnification provisions breached independence requirements. This failure to communicate such critical information raises questions about the firm’s transparency and ethical conduct.

Prager Metis had also faced scrutiny from Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden, who had accused the firm of lacking independence when auditing cryptocurrency companies. Their specific allegation regarding Prager Metis’s audit of FTX, a cryptocurrency exchange that later declared bankruptcy in 2022, adds complexity to the situation.

Importance of auditor independence

The SEC’s legal action against Prager Metis highlights the importance of auditor independence in maintaining the integrity of financial reporting and public trust. The alleged violations spanning several years raise concerns about the auditing practices of Prager Metis and its impact on the clients it served, including FTX.

The outcome of these legal proceedings will determine the extent of accountability and potential consequences for Prager Metis. Additionally, it underscores the need for strict adherence to auditor independence rules and greater transparency in the financial auditing industry.

As this case unfolds, the implications for the cryptocurrency industry and the auditing firms that serve it will be closely monitored. Auditor independence remains a cornerstone of trust in financial markets, and any violations must be addressed to maintain investor confidence.