olympieioncryptonews.com

Hacker Siphons $3 Million Worth of DAI and ETH From Defi Protocol Deus Finance – Bitcoin News

March 15, 2022 | by olympieioncryptonews

Hacker Siphons $3 Million Worth of DAI and ETH From

[ad_1]

Another decentralized finance (defi) protocol was breached this week after it was discovered that a hacker exploited the bilateral over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives platform Deus Finance. According to a post mortem Twitter thread published by the security firm Peckshield, Deus lost around $3 million worth of ethereum and the stablecoin DAI.

Attacker Steals $3 Million From Defi Protocol Deus Finance via Price Oracle Exploit

The crypto community has been conversing about another defi hack after a few reports noted the defi application Deus Finance was siphoned for $3 million in crypto assets. The defi analytics and security firm Peckshield explained how the incident happened on Twitter.

“Deus Finance was exploited — leading to the gain of ~$3M for the hacker (The protocol loss may be larger), including 200,000 DAI and 1101.8 ETH,” Peckshield said. The defi analytics company further added:

The hack is made possible due to the flashloan-assisted manipulation of price oracle that reads the price from the pair of StableV1 AMM – USDC/DEI, so that even normal users, unfortunately, become insolvent.

Native Token DEUS Slides More Than 6%, Deus Finance Closes Contract, Protocol’s TVL Slides 20% Since Friday

The attack against Deus Finance follows a series of defi breaches in 2022, as defi exploits continue to ravage the community’s trust. During the first week of February, it was discovered that the cross-chain bridge Wormhole suffered a $320 million hack.

However, Wormhole’s parent company replenished the stolen funds because the company “believes in a multichain future and that [Wormhole] is essential infrastructure.” During the first week of March, an attacker breached Arbitrum’s Treasure DAO for over 100 NFTs by leveraging a marketplace exploit. As far as the Deus Finance hack is concerned, the team behind the project has addressed the community about the incident.

“We are aware of the recent exploit reports regarding the $DEI lending contract,” the official Deus Twitter account stated. “Contract has been closed, both $DEUS & $DEI are unaffected. Devs are working on a summary of the events, all information will be communicated once we have assessed the full situation.”

Currently, the stablecoin dei Token (DEI) has managed to stay stable but the protocol’s native token DEUS lost 6.4% against the U.S. dollar in the last 24 hours. Despite the loss, the relatively new defi token DEUS has gained 738% in the last 30 days.

On March 12, statistics show that the total value locked (TVL) in Deus Finance was $21.71 million, but that’s been sinking since last Friday. The current TVL in Deus Finance following the hack is $17.28 million which is 20.40% lower than Friday’s TVL stats.

Tags in this story
$3 million, Arbitrum, DAI, decentralized finance, defi app, dei Token (DEI), Deus, Deus Finance, Deus Twitter account, ETH, ether, Ethereum, Ethereum (ETH), Markets, Peckshield, Peckshield post mortem, Prices, stablcoin, Stablecoin, TVL, Twitter, Wormhole

What do you think about the recent Deus Finance hack? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.



[ad_2]

Source link

RELATED POSTS

View all

view all